A Review on Aerodynamic Effects of Surface Texturing in Sports and Engineering

Authors

  • Siqi Shi Shanghai Thomas School, Shanghai, 200001, China
  • Jiaqi Zhang Shanghai United Internation School (Gubei Campus), Shanghai, 200011, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kck8h713

Keywords:

Laminar Flow, Airfoil Leading Edge Roughness, Golf Ball Dimples, Surface Texture.

Abstract

This template mainly focus on the relationship between the surface texture and the aerodynamic performances both in sports field and engineering field. There are several parts this essay is going to mention about. For example, different depth of the dimples in the golf ball could lead to different pressure difference and delayed separation. What is more, the composite material called aluminum alloy can be employed to the airfoils so that they can not only be lighter but also decrease most of the air resistance. Lastly, there is also a cross-scale contrast between the golf dimples and the airfoil leading edge in order to figure the common factors of successful design. The approach we use in the research is literature research method. The result of our research is that a successful design needs to consider about addressing the specific challenges of low speed, high angles, or efficient cruise in order to reach high stability and lower resistance during the movement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Choi, J., Jeon, W., & Choi, H. (2006). Mechanism of drag reduction by dimples on a sphere. Physics of Fluids, 18 (4).

[2] Achenbach, E. (1972). Experiments on the flow past spheres at very high Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 54 (3), 565 – 575.

[3] Li, J., Tsubokura, M., & Tsunoda, M. (2015). Numerical Investigation of the Flow Around a Golf Ball at Around the Critical Reynolds Number and its Comparison with a Smooth Sphere. Flow Turbulence and Combustion, 95 (2 – 3), 415 – 436.

[4] Kim, H., Kim, H., Nakahashi, K., Kato, T., & Tsunoda, M. (2006). Flow Analysis Around Golf Balls without and with Spinning. 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference.

[5] Ziakos, N., Kilimtzidis, S. & Kostopoulos, V. Multidisciplinary aeroelastic optimization of high aspect-ratio composite aircraft wings via tow-steering. CEAS Aeronaut J (2025).

[6] Jia, X., Chang, T., Zhou, S., Zhang, X., Wang, S., & Zhang, Z. (2025b). Progress in bionic deformable wing of aircraft driven by shape memory alloy. Journal of Bionic Engineering.

[7] Callow, M. E., & Fletcher, R. L. (1994). The influence of low surface energy materials on bio adhesion — a review. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 34 (3), 333 – 348.

[8] Surve, M. L., Deshmukh, P. D., Sutar, K. B., Kale, B. S., Silaskar, S. M., & Bhole, K. S. (2025b). Development of two new airfoils for Micro-Capacity wind turbine application. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India) Series C.

[9] Moriyama, K., & Okanaga, H. (2023). Effects of golf ball dimple surface occupancy, volume ratio and depth on aerodynamic characteristics during rotation. Sports Engineering, 26 (1).

[10] Vel, E. K., Vandish, S., Ramesh, M., Rai, S. P., & Pillai, S. N. (2024). Experimental investigation of trailing edge surface roughness on the aerodynamic characteristics of the wind turbine blades. In Lecture notes in mechanical engineering (pp. 35 – 45).

[11] Lyu, B., Kensrud, J., & Smith, L. (2020). The reverse Magnus effect in golf balls. Sports Engineering, 23 (1).

[12] Liu, W., Ni, H., Wang, P., & Zhou, Y. (2020). An investigation on the drag reduction performance of bioinspired pipeline surfaces with transverse microgrooves. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 11, 24– 40.

[13] Chen, D., Fu, L., Hefler, C., Ji, T., Noda, R., Pittman, M., Qiu, H., Shyy, W., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Perspectives on low-Reynolds-number aerodynamics: shape, motion and structure. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 41 (7).

Downloads

Published

30-12-2025

How to Cite

Shi, S., & Zhang, J. (2025). A Review on Aerodynamic Effects of Surface Texturing in Sports and Engineering. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 160, 518-526. https://doi.org/10.54097/kck8h713