Paradigm Shift, Technical Challenges, And Future Path of Exoskeleton Human-Computer Interaction Control Model

Authors

  • Hao Lin School of Science & Technology, City St George’s University of London, London, EC1M 5HD, The United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/j905ha94

Keywords:

Exoskeleton, Control Strategy, Human-Computer Interaction.

Abstract

With the gradual development of exoskeleton robot hardware, the research focus should be transferred to the control model. The current field of exoskeleton control systems is undergoing a paradigm shift from traditional human-computer interaction to human-computer symbiosis. This research focuses on the control model and control strategy of an exoskeleton robot. Through a systematic review of the literature, this paper divides the current control model into four clear control paradigms: brain-less control, perceptual control, predictive control, and symbiotic control, and prospects the future human-computer interaction mode of exoskeleton. At the same time, the core characteristics, typical cases, and limitations of each paradigm are analyzed, and the four trends of human-computer symbiosis are summarized. The future development path of exoskeleton based on artificial intelligence, brain-computer interface, and new sensing technology is outlined. Brainless control can not adapt to individual differences and real-time changes, ignoring the real-time state of people. Perceptual control cannot predict or look forward to motor intention. Predictive control is complex in calculation, highly dependent on the model and data, and mostly in the laboratory stage. In the future, a close coupling and bidirectional communication man-machine relationship will be formed to form a man-machine intelligent unity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Pratt G A, Williamson M M. Series elastic actuators. IEEE Computer Society, 1995, 1: 399-406.

[2] Chai H, Shi C, Wang H, Zhang K, Yang K, Zhao R, Zhang X. Development of exoskeleton robot study. Chinese Medical Equipment Journal, 2013, 34(4): 81-84.

[3] Xu C Y, Zhang J B, Chen W H, et al. Design of rope-driven upper limb exoskeleton rehabilitation robot wearable mechanism. Robot, 2021.

[4] Wang K, Tan X. Review on human-machine interaction control based on exoskeleton robots. Mechanical Engineer, 2022(8): 0-0.

[5] Neville H. Impedance control: an approach to manipulation, part I—theory. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, 1985, 107: 1-8.

[6] Kazerooni H. The Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, 2005.

[7] Zoss A, Kazerooni H, Chu A. Hybrid control of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006.

[8] Sankai Y. HAL: hybrid assistive limb based on cybernics. Robotics Research, 2010, 66: 25-34.

[9] Sun G A, Zhao M, Zhang T F, et al. Adaptive control method of lower limb exoskeleton based on myoelectric prediction model. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 2025, 46(3): 34-41.

[10] Yang P F, Ji L J, Liu F. A compliance control exoskeleton method and system based on deep learning prediction. CN120295093A[P], 2025-07-11.

[11] Wu X, Liang J, Yu Y, Li G, Yen G G, Yu H. Embodied perception, interaction, and cognition for wearable robotics: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 2025.

Downloads

Published

22-01-2026

How to Cite

Lin, H. (2026). Paradigm Shift, Technical Challenges, And Future Path of Exoskeleton Human-Computer Interaction Control Model. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 160, 701-707. https://doi.org/10.54097/j905ha94